Jefferson: Bankers More Dangerous than Armies

Paper is poverty ... it is only the ghost of money, and not money itself.

--Thomas Jefferson

The Colonies financed the Revolutionary War by printing Continental Currency. By 1775, millions of paper bills had been circulated (not including counterfeits which the British issued to destabilize the currency). In a very short time, the money supply had been inflated by 60% which severely eroded the value of the Colonial dollars. By 1779, $26.00 in paper currency was worth only $1.00 in gold. Two years later, $1.00 in gold would purchase 168 dollar bills. The paper money was so devalued that a common phrase emerged, "It's not worth a Continental". The fledgling Colonies had few choices -- borrow from foreign governments or levy a tax.

Delegates to the Constitutional Convention, having learned a bitter lesson, inserted the gold and silver clause into the United States Constitution. Congress would be granted the right to coin money backed by the value of specie (precious metals) while fiat (paper money) would be prohibited. To manage the finances of the Federal government, Alexander Hamilton (Secretary of the Treasury) proposed chartering the Bank of the United States. Similar to the Bank of England, the American bank would be privately owned and the repository of tax collections. It would lend money to the central government which would be responsible for making annual interest payments to cover the cost of the loan and to pay for funding the bank.

This made no sense to Thomas Jefferson who thought it unsound for the government to essentially pay for borrowing money from its own tax receipts. Interest payments would increase annually thereby burdening the American people with mounting debt.

Jefferson wrote:

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already, they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power of money should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs. The principle of spending money [national debt] to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling the future on a grand scale.

Jefferson advised George Washington in 1791 that, "The incorporation of a bank and the powers assumed have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution. They are not among the powers specially enumerated." Needless to say, Jefferson opposed the re-charter of the Bank Bill in 1811.

The Second Bank of the United States was chartered in 1816. Andrew Jackson, an ally of Thomas Jefferson, vetoed the bank's re-charter in 1832 fearing that foreign interests who were permitted to sit on the board could exert control over the United States government. (Incidentally, there were at least two attempts on Jackson's life. We shall see that Lincoln and Kennedy, both of whom were Jeffersonian, succumbed to more tragic fates.)

During the Civil War, President Lincoln needed money to finance the war effort. Foreign banks were glad to finance both the North and the South. They cared not who won the war. Banker and lender Mayer Rothschild once said, "Let me issue and control a nation's money, and I care not who writes its laws." The bankers were going to charge the Union up to 36% interest. Lincoln, like Jefferson, did not believe in debt financing so he authorized Congress to print Treasury Notes that were backed by gold and silver. They would incur no interest and no debt. Lincoln wrote, "... we gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they ever had ... their own paper money to pay their own debts ..."

The London Times printed a scathing commentary of Lincoln's Treasury authorization declaring:

If that mischievous financial policy should become permanent, then the American government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.

This sentiment reflected the opinion of not only the British government but their southern Confederate surrogates. By wars end, Lincoln had printed over 400 million dollars in debt-free paper money saving the United States Treasury 4 billion dollars in interest payments. European bankers and the Confederacy feared the prospect of a wealthy and powerful Union. 

Less than a week after Robert E. Lee's surrender, Lincoln was dead. "Sic semper tyrannis!", shouted John Wilkes Booth. ("Thus always to tyrants!") Shortly after Lincoln's assassination, Congress revoked his executive order to print greenbacks; and all outstanding bills were retired from circulation. The National Banking Act was agreed to which, again, circulated interest bearing bank notes obligating the United States to debt financing.

Fifty years later (in 1913), Congress replaced the National Banking Act with the Federal Reserve Act. Journalist Melvin Sickler wrote that with the establishment of the Federal Reserve ... 

Congress gave up its power to create its own money that it was given in the United States Constitution, and gave this power over to private bankers who call themselves the Federal Reserve. The bankers had achieved their ultimate goal, for now the United States operated under a central bank that was privately owned. They now had the power to run the country by controlling the creation of money, and were free to charge the interest they so desired.

Bankers financed the 1912 presidential campaign of Woodrow Wilson who they strongly lobbied for support of the Federal Reserve. Republicans decried the establishment of the Fed as a recipe for inflation and economic ruin which, in fact, created the conditions that precipitated the Great Depression. Wilson would later say:

A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world -- no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.

Every elected president afterwards was financed by the wealth of the bankers including Franklin Delano Roosevelt. On April 5, 1933, just one month after his inauguration, Roosevelt ordered that all tangible gold assets (coins and certificates) be turned in to Federal Reserve banks. The President of the United States was essentially confiscating the wealth of the nation. Failure to comply would result in imprisonment and/or fines. Congress enacted a law that declared paper currency to be legal tender thus voiding the gold and silver clause of the Constitution. Congress then passed the Gold Reserve Act (1934) which gave the Federal Reserve title to all of the confiscated gold.

The debasing of the dollar continued until the election of John F. Kennedy in 1960. The senator from Massachusetts, and World War ll hero, was a student of history who understood that the Constitution clearly established and defined gold and silver as legal tender. Paper money, unless it was backed by a precious metal, was worthless. Kennedy followed the example of Abraham Lincoln to print his own money and circumvent the bankers.

Executive Order 11110 gave the president authorization to order the issuance of United States Notes. The money, recognizable by its red seal and print, was interest-free, and completely independent of Federal Reserve Notes. Kennedy disregarded the Federal Reserve, and was able to circulate over 4 billion dollars of these debt-free notes.

It is suggested that President Kennedy (in his second term) was planning to abolish the Federal Reserve and repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. He believed if the Federal government could adopt a monetary policy consistent with the Constitution it would virtually eliminate the national debt and usher in an era of unprecedented prosperity. That was the position of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln.

Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 on June 4, 1963. Five months later he was dead. The day after his assassination all United States Notes were called out of circulation.

The Federal Reserve began circulating notes that had no promise of payment in lawful money (gold or silver) -- backed only by the faith of the United States government.

Lyndon Johnson ordered that the silver content of coins be reduced to 40%, and that Federal Reserve Silver Certificates -- the blue notes -- were now fiat currency not redeemable in silver.

Richard Nixon signed an Executive Order ending the gold standard and ordering that all silver certificates be withdrawn from circulation.

The "betrayal" of Woodrow Wilson was complete. 

In 1792, at the insistence of Thomas Jefferson, Congress passed the U.S. Coinage Act which defined the value of a dollar based on a specific weight of gold or silver. That law invoked the death penalty for anyone who debased the value of the dollar. 

Essentially, the United States government borrows worthless money from the Federal Reserve, and pays interest on the loan which profits the bankers while hanging a burdensome debt on the American taxpayer.

The Federal budget is 4 trillion dollars of which 468 billion are earmarked as interest payments. Do note that unfunded liabilities -- Social Security, for example -- total 127 trillion dollars. America is essentially bankrupt. Much of our debt is owned by China, Japan and OPEC. 

What if our creditors called in their markers? Would the ponzi scheme collapse overnight? Well, that scenario is unlikely. That is why China is hoarding gold, and OPEC wants to decouple oil from the U.S. dollar. Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein were outspoken proponents of ending the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. Though they are removed, Russia, Venezuela and Iran -- also at odds with the United States -- strongly advocate that the dollar be dethroned and replaced with a basket of international currencies. This action would plunge the U.S. into Third World status as central banks unload their dollar reserves thus causing an inflationary devaluation reminiscent of 1923 Germany when a wheelbarrow of Marks would not even buy a newspaper. (Note: One U.S. dollar was worth one billion Marks.)

This is a national security problem --- one that sheds light on the geo-political challenges facing America. Capitalism is a pyramid built upon invisible wealth and valueless currency. One U.S. dollar from 1860 has been so eroded by inflation that it is now worth only 4 cents.

In a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives, former Republican congressman Ron Paul said: 

Gold is history's oldest and most stable currency. Central bankers and politicians hate it because it restrains spending and denies them the power to create money and credit out of thin air. Those who promote big government, or welfare financing, cherish this power. History and economic law are on the side of gold. Paper money always fails. Unfortunately, though, this occurs only after many innocent people have suffered the consequences of the fraud that paper money represents.

The precipitous decline of the U.S. dollar has been in stark contrast with the meteoric rise in gold. Since 1971, when President Nixon decided to float the dollar's value, gold has increased 1750%.

America is on the verge of financial collapse. The total debt of the U.S. -- government, corporate and personal -- is over 50 trillion dollars. No one really owns anything. Hard assets are leveraged and purchased with borrowed money. Jefferson said, "The maxim of buying nothing without the money in our pockets to pay for it would make of our country one of the happiest on earth." And the most debt-free.

Cheng Siwei, former vice-chairman of the Communist Party Standing Committee, told the London Telegraph that an economic imbalance exists because the U.S spends and China saves:

Most of our foreign reserves are in U.S. bonds and this is very difficult to change, so we will diversify incremental reserves into euros, yen, and other currencies. Gold is definitely an alternative, but when we buy, the price goes up. We have to do it carefully so as not to stimulate the markets ... because this could fall down. The U.S. spends tomorrow's money today. We Chinese spend today's money tomorrow. That's why we have this financial crisis. (Paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson) He who goes borrowing, goes sorrowing.

Quite an indictment that a Chinese communist has to teach America a lesson from a Founding Father with regards to sound monetary policy. Or, you could make the colloquial argument that the U.S. has China (and the world) right where she wants her.

It is only appropriate that I conclude this treatise with the deliberate advice of Thomas Jefferson who so clearly understood the Constitution, and sound monetary and fiscal policy:

There is a measure which if not taken we are undone ... to cease borrowing money and to pay off the national debt. There does not exist an engine so corruptive of the government and so demoralizing of the nation as a public debt. It will bring on us more ruin at home than all the enemies from abroad. To preserve independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts that we must be taxed in our meat and drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and amusements, and if we must labor 16 hours a day to pay for the debts of the government then we shall surely live with mere subsistence as fellow-sufferers. (Read more here ...)

Copyright © The Conservative Ledger

The Progressive Deception

An editorial in the New York Times blog suggested that Americans are not able to grasp ideas nor do they have any interest in the details.

Vladimir Lenin wrote:

"Most of the people just aren’t capable of thinking."

Lenin cleverly manipulated and exploited the ignorance of the masses through public education and disinformation:

"Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted."

"A lie told often enough becomes truth."

Karl Marx wrote:

"The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother’s care, shall be in public institutions."

Joseph Stalin added:

"The press is our greatest ally. Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed."

Essentially, the state will teach the children what to think, and the press will tell the people what to believe.

The target of socialism, said Lenin, is the family:

"Destroy the family, you destroy the nation."

Lenin established daycare centers to socialize the children. To further erode the family structure, he organized a radical feminist movement to disparage the role of mother and housewife.

The social upheaval swept across Europe in the form of communism or fascism -- two divergent subsets of socialist ideology. 

The American progressive movement adopted many of the features of European socialism including public education, feminist radicalization, progressive taxation, government regulation and a managed economy.

Jonah Goldberg -- editor-at-large of National Review Online -- wrote a book, Liberal Fascism, in which he stated that American liberalism is the unspoken cousin of European fascism.

Author Amanda Busse explains:

Goldberg argues in his book that fascism under Benito Mussolini and Nazism under Adolf Hitler came from the same intellectual source as Progressivism, the birth-mother of American liberalism. The term “liberal fascism” comes from a speech made by author H. G. Wells when he told a group of Young Liberals at Oxford that Progressives must become “liberal fascists” and “enlightened Nazis.”

The irony is that liberals, or progressives, will label "fascist" anyone who disagrees with them much like Hitler calling Stalin fascist.

Goldberg wrote:

Many modern liberals and leftists act as if they know exactly what fascism is. What’s more, they see it everywhere -- except when they look in the mirror. Indeed, the left wields the term like a cudgel to beat opponents from the square like seditious pamphleteers.

The similarities between fascism and American liberalism were further explored by author David Gordon:

Critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal often liken it to fascism. It was recognized to be true during the 1930’s by the New Deal’s supporters as well. When Roosevelt took office in March 1933, he received from Congress an extraordinary delegation of powers to cope with the Depression.

FDR virtually controlled all executive and legislative powers, and his illegal attempt to stack the Supreme Court was designed to usurp all judicial powers as well.

German historian Wolfgang Schivelbusch wrote:

The broad-ranging powers granted to Roosevelt by Congress were unprecedented in times of peace. Congress had, in effect, temporarily done away with itself as the legislative branch of government. The only remaining check (which FDR sought to undue) was the Supreme Court. It was a similar process that allowed Hitler to assume absolute power in Germany.

The Nazi press enthusiastically hailed the New Deal measures. America, like the Reich, had decisively broken with the concept of a free market economy. They praised Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist thought in his economic and social policies, and commended the president for a leadership style that was compatible with Hitler’s dictatorship.

Hitler told American ambassador William Dodd that he was in accord with the President in the view that the virtue of duty, sacrifice and discipline should dominate the people. These social demands are the essence of the German state in that a New World Order has replaced an antiquated emphasis on individual rights.

Author David Gordon noted that fascist dictator Benito Mussolini was fond of FDR’s policies which the Italian leader said "were reminiscent of a state-controlled economy". In reply, FDR said that he stayed in touch with Mussolini and "admired his enthusiasm to modernize Italy with an efficient piece of social machinery".

David Gordon concluded:

What impressed many people at the time was a new style of leadership common in America, Germany and Italy.

Mussolini, Hitler and Roosevelt were idolized. Former Senator Harry Reid said:

"There was no God, there was only FDR."

Hitler envisioned a New World Order in which the needs of the state supplanted the needs of the individual. Lenin said the state -- not the individual -- has exclusive rights. Speaking before the Center for America’s Progress -- a progressive think tank -- former president Bill Clinton articulated his belief that the Constitution is an outdated relic of the 18th century. He remarked that we must stop placing so much emphasis on the principle of individual rights in favor of a more collectivist approach. Collectivist is code for socialist.

Individual rights are the bedrock of our Constitution, but the Democrat Party no longer upholds our founding documents. These are perilous times, indeed.

Copyright © The Conservative Ledger